Redundancy Employment Tribunal Cases

The claimant brought claims for breach of contract (notice pay), redundancy payment, and unlawful deduction of wages (holiday pay) against Great British Kids Ltd. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found all complaints well-founded and awarded the claimant £4,181.01 for notice pay, £8,361.86 for redundancy, and £1,286.44 for unpaid holiday, totalling £13,829.31.

The claimant brought complaints regarding unpaid wages following the closure of her employer at the end of February 2025. She had 11 years' service. The tribunal, proceeding by Rule 22 judgment without attendance of either party, found the claimant entitled to unpaid wages, holiday pay, redundancy payment, and notice pay.

Mr Pearce claimed unfair dismissal, constructive dismissal, failure to pay redundancy, and unauthorised wage deductions against his employer Shane Huntley trading as SH Transport. The tribunal dismissed the dismissal and redundancy claims as not well founded but upheld the wage deduction claim, finding the respondent unlawfully failed to pay £900 for work carried out between 30 December 2024 and 3 January 2025.

The claimant Kelly White brought a claim for redundancy payment against respondent Susie Fevin. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The claimant was awarded £2,970 as a redundancy payment.

The claimant presented claims for unauthorised wage deductions, breach of contract dismissal, and holiday pay entitlement against Signorelli's Deli Ltd. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, allowing the tribunal to proceed under rule 22. The tribunal upheld claims for wage deductions (£2,667), breach of contract damages (£2,667), and unpaid holiday (£1,150.77), but refused the redundancy claim due to lack of two years continuous employment, awarding a total of £6,484.77.

The claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal, unauthorised wage deductions, and redundancy payment. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge proceeded to determine the claim in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The claimant's claims succeeded.