About The Project

A searchable, structured view of UK employment tribunal decisions.

27,895 published judgments indexed and growing.

Why this exists

Tribunal Intel came out of my own experience going through an employment tribunal. Tribunal judgments are public, but actually using them is harder than you might expect. Finding similar cases, seeing what happened, and getting a feel for typical compensation usually means trawling through hundreds of decisions by hand. That is slow, inconsistent, and difficult unless you already know what you are looking for.

The point of Tribunal Intel is to make that material easier to search and compare.

Not legal advice — always read the original judgment

What it does

Search every decision

Find employment tribunal judgments by employer, outcome, claim type, date, or compensation. Every case is full-text searchable.

See the patterns

Turn raw judgments into trend data — respondent histories, compensation benchmarks, and claim-type breakdowns across thousands of cases.

Save hours of due diligence

What used to mean trawling GOV.UK manually now takes seconds. Structured fields, employer profiles, and instant filtering do the legwork.

Coverage

Annual indexing coverage

Cases indexed here vs. decisions currently available on GOV.UK per year.

Coverage expands as more GOV.UK decisions are indexed.
2026
92%
1,811 / 1,976 indexed
2025
~100%
10,610 indexed
2024
~100%
10,945 indexed
2023
12%
1,391 / 11,837 indexed
2022
9%
1,058 / 12,009 indexed
2021
8%
1,056 / 12,619 indexed
2020
6%
1,024 / 18,503 indexed
Current Coverage

A snapshot of how much of the indexed archive is searchable and structured right now.

Date range
2020-01-02 to 2026-11-25
Cases indexed
27,895
Employers
18,558
distinct respondents on record

Best For

Fast checks on a specific employer, claim type, or decision.
Pattern work across outcomes, compensation, and tribunal history.
Indicative reference points before deeper review of the original judgment.

Use With Care

The published GOV.UK judgment remains the source of record.
Coverage percentages reflect what is currently indexed, not every tribunal event that may exist.
Structured fields are shortcuts for research, not legal advice.