About The Project

A searchable, structured view of UK employment tribunal decisions.

29,091 published judgments indexed and growing.

Why this exists

I built this after being unfairly dismissed. I knew nothing — not what an ET1 was, not what ACAS early conciliation involved, not which arguments carried weight or which legal provisions to cite. I had no idea what compensation was realistic, and I was completely unprepared for how long the process would take.

The judgments are public. But useful ones are buried, and reading through them by hand takes hours. Tribunal Intel is meant to make that first research step easier: find similar cases, see how they ended, and understand what outcomes tend to look like before deciding what to do next.

Not legal advice

Always read the original judgment before relying on a case summary or data point.

What it does

Search every decision

Find employment tribunal judgments by employer, outcome, claim type, date, or compensation. Every case is full-text searchable.

See the patterns

Turn raw judgments into trend data — respondent histories, compensation benchmarks, and claim-type breakdowns across thousands of cases.

Save hours of due diligence

What used to mean trawling GOV.UK manually now takes seconds. Structured fields, employer profiles, and instant filtering do the legwork.

Coverage

Annual indexing coverage

Cases indexed here vs. decisions currently available on GOV.UK per year.

Coverage expands as more GOV.UK decisions are indexed.
2026
91%
2,839 / 3,104 indexed
2025
~100%
10,680 indexed
2024
~100%
11,015 indexed
2023
12%
1,452 / 11,829 indexed
2022
9%
1,093 / 12,003 indexed
2021
9%
1,105 / 12,619 indexed
2020
6%
1,065 / 18,504 indexed
Current Coverage

A snapshot of how much of the indexed archive is searchable and structured right now.

Date range
2020-01-02 to 2026-11-25
Cases indexed
29,091
Employers
19,330
distinct respondents on record

Best For

Fast checks on a specific employer, claim type, or decision.
Pattern work across outcomes, compensation, and tribunal history.
Indicative reference points before deeper review of the original judgment.

Use With Care

The published GOV.UK judgment remains the source of record.
Coverage percentages reflect what is currently indexed, not every tribunal event that may exist.
Structured fields are shortcuts for research, not legal advice.