Unfair Dismissal Employment Tribunal Cases
Review published unfair dismissal decisions, outcome patterns, visible award levels, and the employers that appear most often in the current Tribunal Intel dataset.
Visible cases
8,797
Claimant success rate
28.0%
Cases with compensation
999
Highest visible award
£3,449,328.54
How to read this page
Users looking for unfair dismissal tribunal cases often want recent examples, likely outcomes, and comparable employers.
Unfair dismissal appears in a wide range of fact patterns, so published judgments are best read as directional evidence rather than a simple universal win-rate proxy.
The figures here are based on published judgments currently visible in Tribunal Intel, not every claim filed in the employment tribunal system.
Examples of unfair dismissal cases employees won
Recent published unfair dismissal decisions where the claimant succeeded or partly succeeded, with controlled reason labels to show why the case appears to have been won.
9 recent examples
Automatically unfair reason
The dismissal was linked to a protected reason, such as whistleblowing, pregnancy, trade union activity, or statutory rights.
Example: 8001751/20254 recent examples
Constructive dismissal breach
The employee resigned in response to conduct that the tribunal treated as a fundamental or repudiatory breach.
Example: 4101448/20253 recent examples
Disciplinary process flawed
The disciplinary hearing, appeal, or related process was flawed enough to undermine the dismissal.
Example: 6009627/20256009627/2025
Mr M Aslam v John Lewis plc: 6009627/2025
Award
£25,544
Why it appears to have succeeded
Disciplinary process flawed
The judgment points to flaws in the disciplinary hearing, appeal, or related process before dismissal.
4101448/2025
Mr G Bruce v HSS Proservice Ltd: 4101448/2025
Award
£29,286
Why it appears to have succeeded
Constructive dismissal breach
The employee appears to have resigned after conduct that the tribunal treated as a serious breach by the employer.
8001751/2025
Mrs J O’Donnell v HBOS plc: 8001751/2025
Award
£10,020
Why it appears to have succeeded
Automatically unfair reason
The dismissal appears to have been linked to a protected reason, such as whistleblowing, pregnancy, trade union activity, health and safety, or statutory rights.
3200259/2025
Ms S Milford v Ocean Hill Lodge Ltd: 3200259/2025
Award
£2,000
Why it appears to have succeeded
Constructive dismissal breach
The employee appears to have resigned after conduct that the tribunal treated as a serious breach by the employer.
1811237/2024
Miss C O'Connor v Safe Haven Adolescent Care Group Ltd: 1811237/2024
Award
£56,621
Why it appears to have succeeded
Automatically unfair reason
The dismissal appears to have been linked to a protected reason, such as whistleblowing, pregnancy, trade union activity, health and safety, or statutory rights.
1302932/2024
Mrs P Mathews v BAH Employment Ltd (In creditors voluntary liquidation): 1302932/2024
Award
£10,266
Why it appears to have succeeded
Automatically unfair reason
The dismissal appears to have been linked to a protected reason, such as whistleblowing, pregnancy, trade union activity, health and safety, or statutory rights.
Recent decisions
[2026] EAT 64
Miss A Ndow v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust: [2026] EAT 64
[2026] EAT 58
Mr L Tarbuc v Martello Piling Ltd: [2026] EAT 58
[2026] EAT 61
Mr D Foat v Department for Work and Pensions: [2026] EAT 61
6022127/2024
Ms A Kataria v Morgan Payne and Knightly Sandwell Ltd: 6022127/2024
6009700/2024
Mr B Williams v Mitchell’s And Butlers: 6009700/2024
1806671/2025
A Khwarazmi v The Gorse Academies Trust: 1806671/2025
6025506/2025
Mrs E Olas v Dunbia (UK): 6025506/2025
6002661/2026
L Hole v Air Charter Service: 6002661/2026
Compensation profile
No confident compensation distribution is available yet for this claim type.
Employers in this dataset view
Outcome mix
Related paths
Co-occurring claim types
No related claim-type mix is available yet.