Disability Discrimination Employment Tribunal Cases
Explore published disability discrimination cases, including reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from disability, dismissal and absence disputes, claimant-success patterns, visible awards, and recurring respondents.
Visible cases
2,748
Claimant success rate
24.0%
Cases with compensation
99
Highest visible award
£265,719
How to read this page
Users searching disability discrimination cases usually want concrete examples, common fact patterns, compensation context, and a sense of how often claimants succeed in published judgments.
These cases often involve mixed issues such as reasonable adjustments, dismissal, capability, or harassment, so co-occurring claim types matter.
The figures here are based on published judgments currently visible in Tribunal Intel, not every claim filed in the employment tribunal system.
Common patterns in awarded successful disability discrimination cases
These patterns are drawn from recent disability discrimination decisions where the claimant succeeded or partly succeeded and a monetary award is visible. They highlight the workplace issues that appear in awarded wins, not every disability discrimination claim.
Dismissal, absence, and capability
5 recentMixed disability and dismissal cases where the tribunal looks at medical evidence, occupational health, alternatives to dismissal, and process fairness.
6022005/2025
Reasonable adjustments
5 recentCases where the dispute turns on whether the employer changed duties, hours, processes, equipment, or expectations to reduce a disability-related disadvantage.
6022005/2025
Harassment or victimisation
4 recentCases involving unwanted conduct, hostile treatment, comments about disability, or detrimental treatment after raising disability-related complaints.
6022005/2025
Discrimination arising from disability
1 recentCases where treatment was connected to something arising from disability, such as absence, performance, conduct, symptoms, or medical restrictions.
6022005/2025
Examples where disability discrimination claims succeeded
6022005/2025
Miss R Clayton v Secretary of State for Justice: 6022005/2025
Award
£1,343
Miss Rebecca Clayton brought discrimination and contractual claims against the Secretary of State for Justice. The tribunal upheld her complaint of discrimination arising from disability regarding being informed she was likely to trigger Stage 2 warning procedure, but dismissed her other discrimination claims, reasonable adjustment claims, and withdrawn contractual claims. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,342.82 comprising £1,235 injury to feelings (reduced by 5% for failure to issue a grievance) plus interest.
1811237/2024
Miss C O'Connor v Safe Haven Adolescent Care Group Ltd: 1811237/2024
Award
£56,621
The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was upheld, and the tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments also succeeded. However, the complaints relating to detriment for making a protected disclosure, victimisation, harassment, and unlawful deduction from wages were dismissed. The tribunal awarded a total of £56,621.45 comprising a basic award of £1,929, compensatory award of £42,230, injury to feelings of £11,000, and interest of £1,462.
2301923/2023
Mr R Hunter v EDF Energy Ltd: 2301923/2023
Award
£28,098
This is a remedy judgment in a case between Mr Reese Hunter and EDF Energy Limited heard at the Midlands West Employment Tribunal on 23-24 March 2026. The tribunal awarded the claimant total damages of £28,097.78 comprising compensation for financial losses, interest, compensation for injury to feelings, and interest thereon.
6000953/2024
Mr D Thomas v Wienerberger Ltd: 6000953/2024
Award
£22,615
The claimant brought claims of disability discrimination, harassment and constructive unfair dismissal against Wienerberger Ltd. The tribunal found the failure to make reasonable adjustments complaint succeeded, certain disability related harassment allegations (1, 8 and 9) succeeded, but victimisation complaints and the constructive unfair dismissal claim were dismissed. The claimant was awarded £17,000 for injury to feelings plus interest totalling £22,615.12.
6015499/2024
Miss M N Bradbury v Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole Council: 6015499/2024
Award
£4,702
The claimant was found to have been unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £3360, though the compensatory award was reduced to nil. The tribunal also found the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments regarding the claimant's attendance at team meetings in October, November 2023 and March 2024, awarding £1140 for injury to feelings plus £202 interest, totalling £4702. The wrongful dismissal claim was dismissed.
6021222/2024
Miss K Anderson v Interflex Scotland Ltd: 6021222/2024
Award
£2,647
Miss K Anderson claimed unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims against Interflex Scotland Limited. The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well-founded but dismissed the disability-related complaints. The tribunal determined the claimant would have been fairly dismissed within one month if proper procedures had been followed, and awarded a basic award of £949.28 and compensatory award of £1,697.83 with a 20% uplift for failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice.
Recent decisions
[2026] EAT 66
Mr R Tedd v Surrey County Council: [2026] EAT 66
[2026] EAT 54
Mr J Truman v (1) SPL Powerlines UK Ltd (2) Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (3) Express Medicals Ltd: [2026] EAT 54
[2026] EAT 64
Miss A Ndow v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust: [2026] EAT 64
[2026] EAT 61
Mr D Foat v Department for Work and Pensions: [2026] EAT 61
6009700/2024
Mr B Williams v Mitchell’s And Butlers: 6009700/2024
1806671/2025
A Khwarazmi v The Gorse Academies Trust: 1806671/2025
6023503/2025
G Bolohan v Solway Foods Ltd: 6023503/2025
6025506/2025
Mrs E Olas v Dunbia (UK): 6025506/2025
Compensation profile
No confident compensation distribution is available yet for this claim type.
Recent award examples
Employers in this dataset view
Outcome mix
Related paths
Co-occurring claim types
No related claim-type mix is available yet.