Claim Type

Disability Discrimination Employment Tribunal Cases

Explore published disability discrimination cases, including reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from disability, dismissal and absence disputes, claimant-success patterns, visible awards, and recurring respondents.

Visible cases

2,748

Claimant success rate

24.0%

Cases with compensation

99

Highest visible award

£265,719

How to read this page

Users searching disability discrimination cases usually want concrete examples, common fact patterns, compensation context, and a sense of how often claimants succeed in published judgments.

These cases often involve mixed issues such as reasonable adjustments, dismissal, capability, or harassment, so co-occurring claim types matter.

The figures here are based on published judgments currently visible in Tribunal Intel, not every claim filed in the employment tribunal system.

Examples where disability discrimination claims succeeded

6022005/2025

Miss R Clayton v Secretary of State for Justice: 6022005/2025

16 Apr 2026Partial success

Award

£1,343

Miss Rebecca Clayton brought discrimination and contractual claims against the Secretary of State for Justice. The tribunal upheld her complaint of discrimination arising from disability regarding being informed she was likely to trigger Stage 2 warning procedure, but dismissed her other discrimination claims, reasonable adjustment claims, and withdrawn contractual claims. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,342.82 comprising £1,235 injury to feelings (reduced by 5% for failure to issue a grievance) plus interest.

1811237/2024

Miss C O'Connor v Safe Haven Adolescent Care Group Ltd: 1811237/2024

31 Mar 2026Partial success

Award

£56,621

The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was upheld, and the tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments also succeeded. However, the complaints relating to detriment for making a protected disclosure, victimisation, harassment, and unlawful deduction from wages were dismissed. The tribunal awarded a total of £56,621.45 comprising a basic award of £1,929, compensatory award of £42,230, injury to feelings of £11,000, and interest of £1,462.

2301923/2023

Mr R Hunter v EDF Energy Ltd: 2301923/2023

24 Mar 2026Claimant won

Award

£28,098

This is a remedy judgment in a case between Mr Reese Hunter and EDF Energy Limited heard at the Midlands West Employment Tribunal on 23-24 March 2026. The tribunal awarded the claimant total damages of £28,097.78 comprising compensation for financial losses, interest, compensation for injury to feelings, and interest thereon.

6000953/2024

Mr D Thomas v Wienerberger Ltd: 6000953/2024

18 Mar 2026Partial success

Award

£22,615

The claimant brought claims of disability discrimination, harassment and constructive unfair dismissal against Wienerberger Ltd. The tribunal found the failure to make reasonable adjustments complaint succeeded, certain disability related harassment allegations (1, 8 and 9) succeeded, but victimisation complaints and the constructive unfair dismissal claim were dismissed. The claimant was awarded £17,000 for injury to feelings plus interest totalling £22,615.12.

6015499/2024

Miss M N Bradbury v Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole Council: 6015499/2024

17 Mar 2026Partial success

Award

£4,702

The claimant was found to have been unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £3360, though the compensatory award was reduced to nil. The tribunal also found the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments regarding the claimant's attendance at team meetings in October, November 2023 and March 2024, awarding £1140 for injury to feelings plus £202 interest, totalling £4702. The wrongful dismissal claim was dismissed.

6021222/2024

Miss K Anderson v Interflex Scotland Ltd: 6021222/2024

12 Mar 2026Partial success

Award

£2,647

Miss K Anderson claimed unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims against Interflex Scotland Limited. The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well-founded but dismissed the disability-related complaints. The tribunal determined the claimant would have been fairly dismissed within one month if proper procedures had been followed, and awarded a basic award of £949.28 and compensatory award of £1,697.83 with a 20% uplift for failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice.

Outcome mix

Respondent won1,312 · 48%
Partial success479 · 17%
Struck out306 · 11%
Claimant won177 · 6%
Withdrawn94 · 3%
Settled29 · 1%

Related paths

Co-occurring claim types

No related claim-type mix is available yet.