Decision date
29 May 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Shepherd
Case Summary
The claimant brought claims for sexual harassment, victimisation, whistleblowing detriment, health and safety detriment, and unfair dismissal against the respondent. The tribunal heard evidence over 8 days in April 2026 and deliberated in May 2026. All claims were dismissed as not well-founded in this liability judgment.
Why this outcome?
Claim not well-foundedThe tribunal made findings of fact on the balance of probabilities and applied the relevant legal tests for each claim, concluding that none of the claims were established. The judgment was a liability-only hearing with remedy to be determined separately if any claims had succeeded.
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •Sexual harassment under section 26(2) Equality Act 2010
- •Victimisation under section 27 Equality Act 2010
- •Detriment on grounds of protected disclosure (whistleblowing)
- •Health and safety detriment
- •Unfair dismissal under section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- •Automatically unfair dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- •Whether respondent took reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment under section 40A Equality Act 2010
Related Cases
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 6018520/2024
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 29 May 2026
- Published
- 24 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd
- Representation
- Litigant in person