Decision date
1 June 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Sudra
Case Summary
The claimant applied for interim relief following his resignation on 10 May 2026, claiming constructive unfair dismissal and whistleblowing detriments after making protected disclosures about breaches of national minimum wage, health and safety, and working time regulations between February and May 2026. Employment Judge Sudra refused the application, finding that based on the evidence available, the tribunal could not conclude the claimant had a pretty good chance of success in the substantive claim, as the factual dispute between the parties (whether the alleged detriments were caused by the protected disclosures or by business efficacy reasons) was too complex to assess at the interim relief stage.
Why this outcome?
No reasonable prospectsThe tribunal refused interim relief because it could not assess, based on the evidence available at the preliminary hearing, that the claimant had a pretty good chance of success in the substantive claim. The factual dispute over whether the respondent's alleged detriments (non-availability of work, changes to pay and conditions) were caused by the claimant's protected disclosures or by the respondent's business efficacy reasons (changes to commuting time policies and machinery misuse) was too complex and contested for determination at the interim relief stage.
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •Whether claimant has a pretty good chance of success in the substantive claim for unfair dismissal based on protected disclosures under s.103A ERA
- •Whether the respondent's alleged detriments (changes to pay, conditions, and non-availability of work) were caused by the protected disclosures
- •Whether the respondent's business efficacy arguments (changes to commuting time policies and damage caused by machinery misuse) are credible alternative explanations
- •Assessment of interim relief eligibility where the tribunal cannot make sufficient factual findings
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 2300946/2026
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 1 June 2026
- Published
- 26 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
- Industry
- gardening and landscaping
- Representation
- Litigant in person