1404855/2018Claimant won

University of Southampton

v Dr R Werner

11 June 2021·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Emerton

Respondent

University of Southampton

All cases →

Decision date

11 June 2021

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Emerton

Compensation awarded

£3,449,329

Basic Award

£9,652

Compensatory

£625

Injury to Feelings

£38,750

Extracted from judgment text — may not capture every award component precisely.

Case Summary

The claimant's claims for wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal, failure to pay holiday pay, direct religion or belief discrimination, direct race discrimination, indirect religion or belief discrimination, indirect race discrimination, harassment related to religion or belief, harassment related to race and victimisation were well founded.

Why this outcome?

The tribunal found that all of the claimant's claims were well-founded on their merits following a full hearing, including wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal, failure to pay holiday pay, and multiple discrimination claims based on religion or belief and race.

Related guide

Unfair dismissal cases won in the UK

Compare this judgment with other successful unfair dismissal cases and controlled win reasons.

Open examples

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • key legal issues/arguments

Decision Text

Full PDF

1 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL SITTING AT: SOUTHAMPTON BEFORE: EMPLOYMENT JUDGE EMERTON (sitting alone) BETWEEN: Dr R Werner Claimant AND University of Southampton Respondent ON: 5 June 2019 APPEARANCES: For the Claimant: In person For the Respondent: Not represented [Response not presented] JUDGMENT Liability 1. The following claims are well founded, pursuant to rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013: wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal, failure to pay holiday pay, direct religion or belief discrimination, direct race discrimination, indirect religion or belief discrimination, indirect race discrimination, harassment related to religion or belief, harassment related to race and victimisation. 2. The Recoupment Regulations do not apply. Remedy 3. The claimant would be entitled to compensation for wrongful dismissal (notice pay) of £12,552.60. The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the applicable ACAS Code of Practice. The tribunal considers it just 2 and equitable to increase compensation by 25%. The respondent is therefore ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £15,690.75. 4. The claimant is entitled to a basic award for unfair dismissal of £9,652.00 5. The claimant would be entitled to compensation for a compensatory award for unfair dismissal of £500.00, representing loss of statutory rights. The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the applicable ACAS Code of Practice. The tribunal considers it just and equitable to increase the compensatory award by 25%. The respondent is therefore ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £625.00. 6. No further sums are due in respect of the compensatory award, because these have been ordered as compensation for di

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.