London College of Communication

Case Summary

Ms Amira Moses brought claims against London College of Communication but did not attend the hearing. The tribunal struck out all claims under Rule 38(1)(a) on the basis that the claimant failed to establish she had been an employee, worker, or had any other status giving rise to jurisdiction.

The claims were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant failed to establish that she had been an employee, worker, or possessed any other status that would give the tribunal jurisdiction to hear the claims.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •employment status
• •jurisdiction

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms Amira Moses Respondent: London College of Communication Heard at: London South (by CVP) On: 23 March 2026 Before: Employment Judge O’Neill REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Did not attend Respondent: Mr Harris, counsel JUDGMENT 1. All of the claims are struck out under Rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 , as having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant failed to establish that she had been an employee, worker or had any other status that would give rise to a claim that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear. Approved by: Employment Judge O’Neill 23 March 2026 2 Notes - Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online. - All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. - If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found at www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation- practice-directions/