London College of Communication

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms Amira Moses Respondent: London College of Communication Heard at: London South (by CVP) On: 23 March 2026 Before: Employment Judge O’Neill REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Did not attend Respondent: Mr Harris, counsel JUDGMENT 1. All of the claims are struck out under Rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 , as having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant failed to establish that she had been an employee, worker or had any other status that would give rise to a claim that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear. Approved by: Employment Judge O’Neill 23 March 2026 2 Notes - Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online. - All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. - If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found at www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation- practice-directions/