Mitchell’s And Butlers

Case Summary

The claimant did not appear at the hearing scheduled for 20 April 2026 and had failed to respond to multiple tribunal letters or maintain contact with the respondent. The tribunal dismissed the claims under Rule 47 due to the claimant's non-appearance and non-compliance.

The claimant did not appear at the hearing, had not replied to the tribunal's letters of 29 August 2024, 20 February 2025 or 27 June 2025, and had not been in touch with the respondent. The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 as a result of this non-compliance and lack of engagement.

• •Claimant non-appearance
• •Failure to comply with tribunal correspondence
• •Lack of contact with respondent

PHCM Order (NEW August 2020) 1 of 1 August 2020 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: MR BRADLEY WILLIAMS Respondent: MITCHELL’S AND BUTLERS JUDGMENT Heard at: In private; by CVP On: 20 April 2026 at 2 p.m. Before: Employment Judge N. Clarke Appearances For the Claimant: No appearance For the Respondent: Mr A. Kay, Solicitor (and Miss L Leech from the Respondent) 1. The Claimant did not appear today. An attempt to speak to him on the telephone was not successful. He had not replied to the Tribunal’s letters of 29 August 2024, 20 February 2025 or 27 June 2025. Neither had he been in touch with the Respondent. 2. The claims are dismissed under Rule 47. EJ. N. Clarke 21 April 2026