Decision date
4 May 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Heap
Case Summary
The claimant claimed constructive unfair dismissal, race discrimination, harassment, whistleblowing detriment and unauthorised wage deductions against Impact Ducting Sales Ltd. The tribunal found the unauthorised deductions claim succeeded in that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from holiday pay (declaration only, as sums were already repaid), but dismissed the constructive dismissal, direct race discrimination, harassment and whistleblowing detriment claims.
Why this outcome?
One claim dismissed on the meritsThe tribunal found that while the respondent did make unauthorised deductions from holiday pay (for which a declaration was made as the sums had already been repaid), the claimant's other claims failed. The constructive dismissal claim failed because the respondent's actions—including proposed changes to pay structure and contract terms—did not breach the implied term of trust and confidence; the respondent had given the claimant options and reasonable explanations. The discrimination and harassment claims failed as the tribunal rejected the claimant's allegations of discriminatory conduct. The whistleblowing detriment claim failed because the claimant had not properly pleaded a breach of legal obligation (the only malpractice he had properly pleaded was fraud), and the tribunal ruled this ground was not permitted to be expanded at the hearing.
Claim Types
Related guide
Unfair dismissal cases won in the UK
Compare this judgment with other successful unfair dismissal cases and controlled win reasons.
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •Whether the claimant was constructively dismissed
- •Whether the respondent breached the implied term of trust and confidence
- •Whether there were unauthorised deductions from holiday pay
- •Whether there was direct race discrimination
- •Whether there was harassment related to race
- •Whether there was detriment for protected disclosure (whistleblowing)
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Leicester Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 6002987/2024
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 4 May 2026
- Published
- 3 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
- Industry
- sheet metal fabrication
- Representation
- Litigant in person