Decision date
2 February 2024
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Le Grys
No final compensation award yet
The judgment records agreed sums already owed and percentage adjustments for unfair dismissal, but it does not set out the final unfair-dismissal compensation figure.
Any figure in the judgment may reflect agreed pay, holiday pay, wages or expenses rather than the final compensation award.
Case Summary
The Tribunal found that claims for discrimination arising from disability, discrimination on the basis of a failure to make reasonable adjustments, and unfair dismissal were well founded. The claim for redundancy payment was not successful.
Why this outcome?
One claim dismissed on the meritsThe tribunal found the discrimination and unfair dismissal claims to be well founded on their merits following a full hearing, but rejected the redundancy payment claim as it did not succeed on the evidence.
Claim Types
Related guide
Unfair dismissal cases won in the UK
Compare this judgment with other successful unfair dismissal cases and controlled win reasons.
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •Discrimination arising from disability
- •Discrimination on the basis of a failure to make reasonable adjustments
- •Unfair dismissal
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Bristol Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 2601591/2021
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 2 February 2024
- Published
- 25 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Le Grys
- Representation
- Legally represented
Registered Company
- Company name
- MICROLISE LIMITED
- Company number
- 03037936
- Industry
- Technology & Telecoms
- Status
- active