Ryan Speciality Corporate Services Ltd

Case Summary

This is a preliminary hearing at which the Employment Judge considered the viability of the claimant's various discrimination and unfair dismissal claims. The tribunal struck out complaints of unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions, and certain discrimination allegations for having no reasonable prospects of success, imposed deposit orders on indirect discrimination and other claims, and issued an unless order regarding disability discrimination. Claims for harassment because of race and specific allegations of direct race/religious discrimination were allowed to proceed to hearing.

The tribunal struck out several claims for having no reasonable prospects of success based on the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing. Other claims were made subject to deposit orders because they have little reasonable prospects of success, and the disability discrimination complaint was made subject to an unless order requiring further compliance. Only the harassment because of race claim and specific allegations numbered (6), (7) and (8) were found to have sufficient merit to proceed to hearing.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Unfair dismissal
• •Unauthorised deductions from wages
• •Age discrimination
• •Direct race and religious discrimination
• •Indirect race and religious discrimination
• •Failure to provide Continuing Professional Development
• •Working from home restrictions based on age
• •Disability discrimination
• •Harassment because of race

Case No:2406399/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: A Alim Respondent: Ryan Speciality Corporate Services Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard at: Manchester On: 27 April 2026 Before: Employment Judge Batten (sitting alone) Representation: For the claimant: in person For the respondent: A Mohamed, Solicitor JUDGMENT Upon hearing from the parties present, the judgment of the Tribunal is that: 1. The complaints of unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages and age discrimination, together with the allegations of direct race/religious discrimination numbered (2), (3), (4) and (5) in the draft list of issues appended to the case management orders of Employment Judge Butler, sent to the parties on 29 April 2025, are struck out for having no reasonable prospects of success; 2. The following complaints are subject to deposit orders as set out in the attached document because they have little reasonable prospects of success: a. The complaint of indirect race/religious discrimination; Case No:2406399/2024 b. Allegation (1) in the draft list of issues appended to the case management orders of Employment Judge Butler, sent to the parties on 29 April 2025, of a failure to provide the claimant with Continuing Professional Development; c. Allegation (9) in the draft list of issues appended to the case management orders of Employment Judge Butler, sent to the parties on 29 April 2025, of the claimant not being allowed to work from home for at least 3 days per week because he was under 35 years of age; 3. The complaint of disability discrimination is subject to an Unless Order, the terms of set out in the attached document; 4. The following complaints shall proceed to hearing: a. Harassment because of race; b. The allegations of direct race/religious discrimination numbered (6), (7) and (8) in the draft list of issues appended to…