Whistleblowing Compensation Calculator

The claimant's claims that he was subjected to detriments for making public interest disclosures were not brought in time and it was reasonably practicable to bring them in time, so they are struck out.

The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was upheld, and the tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments also succeeded. However, the complaints relating to detriment for making a protected disclosure, victimisation, harassment, and unlawful deduction from wages were dismissed. The tribunal awarded a total of £56,621.45 comprising a basic award of £1,929, compensatory award of £42,230, injury to feelings of £11,000, and interest of £1,462.

The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded, and he was awarded compensation of £33,720.12. The complaints of victimisation and automatically unfair dismissal due to protected disclosure were dismissed.

The claimant was dismissed from her role as Quality Health & Safety Manager after 15 months of employment. She brought claims for automatic unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure and harassment related to sex or of a sexual nature. The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim but dismissed the harassment claim.

The claimant's claim of unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures succeeds. The compensatory element of the award is reduced by 50%, but no reduction is made for contributory fault. The claimant's claim for one week's notice pay also succeeds.

The claimant succeeded in claims for unauthorized deductions from wages, breach of contract (unpaid bonus), failure to pay statutory holiday, and failure to provide written statement of employment particulars. The tribunal dismissed the claims for unfair dismissal and whistleblowing detriment.

The claimant worked as a bank staff or 'Flexi Team Service' at the respondent's mental health hospital. She was dismissed after raising concerns about a patient's neglected pets with the RSPCA. The tribunal found that the dismissal amounted to unlawful detriment for making a protected disclosure.

The claimant brought a discrimination claim alleging the first respondent failed to invite him to interview because of his disability. The tribunal found the claimant's conduct of proceedings to be unreasonable, scandalous and vexatious, including repeated non-attendance at hearings, excessive correspondence, and failure to comply with orders for medical evidence. The claim was struck out and the claimant ordered to pay £20,000 in costs to the first respondent.

The claimant was found to have been automatically unfairly dismissed by the respondent under s103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and to have suffered a detriment under s47B of the same Act. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £19,298.

The respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant. Compensation is awarded for loss of earnings and loss of pension benefit up until the date of the respondent's compulsory liquidation. No awards made for bonus or injury to feelings.