Discover the World Ltd

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss S Mohammed Respondent: Discover the World Limited Heard at: London South Employment Tribunal by video (CVP) On: 22 October 2025 Before: Employment Judge Macey Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Mr Feeny, counsel JUDGMENT 1. By consent the respondent’s name is amended to Discover the World Limited. 2. The claimant’s complaints of automatic unfair dismissal by reason of making a protected disclosure and suffering a detriment on the grounds of making a protected disclosure are dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. 3. The claimant has less than 2 years’ continuous service with the respondent at the date of her dismissal and, pursuant to Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the Employment Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear a claim of unfair dismissal as presented. 4. The claimant has no reasonable prospect of establishing that it was not reasonably practicable to present her complaints for breach of contract and unauthorised deductions from wages within the applicable time limit. The complaints of breach of contract and unauthorised deductions from wages are therefore struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a). 5. The application to strike out the complaints of discrimination is refused. The Tribunal will decide at the final hearing whether or not the complaints of discrimination were presented within the applicable time limit. REASONS 1. The purpose of the preliminary hearing in public was to decide the respondent’s strike- out application based upon the claimant not presenting her complaints to the Tribunal within the applicable time limits. PROCEDURE 2. There was a preliminary hearing bundle prepared by the respondent of 50 pages. The claimant also provided two pdf documents to the Tribunal and the respondent in advance of the hearing (though unfortunately the Tribunal did not have sight of these un...