FE Realisations 2025 Ltd (In Administration)

Case Summary

The claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal and redundancy pay against the respondent. The tribunal struck out both claims because the claimant had less than two years' service, which is a statutory requirement under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out despite being given the opportunity.

The claimant lacked the required two years' service under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, and failed to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out despite being given the opportunity.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Lack of two years' service requirement under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
• •Claimant's failure to provide acceptable reason why complaint should not be struck out

each EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr P J Mlodzianowski Respondent: FE Realisations 2025 Limited (In Administration) JUDGMENT The claimants claims for: i) unfairly dismissal; ii) Redundancy pay are struck out. REASONS 1. The claimant complains of unfair dismissal. 2. Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years’ service to make an unfair dismissal complaint. 3. The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years. 4. Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint. 5. The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out. 6. Accordingly, the complaints of unfair dismissal and redundancy pay are struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Approved by Employment Judge Cadney Date: 28 th March 2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 24 April 2026