6025227/2025Claimant won

The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs

v Mr O Lemboye

13 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge A. Beale KC

Respondent

The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs

All cases →

Decision date

13 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge A. Beale KC

Case Summary

The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. However, it determined that had a fair procedure been followed, the likelihood of dismissal was 100%, and applied a 100% reduction for contributory fault. No basic or compensatory award was payable as a result.

Why this outcome?

Dismissal found fair

The tribunal found the dismissal unfair due to procedural failings. However, it determined that the claimant would have been dismissed with certainty had a fair procedure been followed, and found the claimant bore contributory fault, resulting in a complete 100% reduction of any compensatory or basic award.

Claim Types

Related guide

Unfair dismissal cases won in the UK

Compare this judgment with other successful unfair dismissal cases and controlled win reasons.

Open examples

Key Issues

  • fairness of dismissal procedure
  • likelihood of dismissal had fair procedure been followed
  • contributory fault reduction

Decision Text

Full PDF

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr O. Lemboye Respondent: The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs Heard at: London South Employment Tribunal (by CVP) On: 4 - 5 February 2026 Before: Employment Judge A. Beale KC Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Ms I. Stinga (Counsel) REMEDY JUDGMENT 1. The Tribunal found, in a reserved judgment dated 19 February 2026, that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed. 2. The Tribunal further found that: (a) had a fair procedure been followed, the likelihood that the Claimant would have been dismissed was 100%, meaning any compensatory award made would fall to be reduced by 100%; (b) there should be a 100% reduction to any basic or compensatory award on the basis of the Claimant’s contributory fault. 3. The Claimant has confirmed, by letter dated 29 March 2026, that he does not seek reinstatement or re-engagement. 4. On the above basis, no order for reinstatement or re-engagement is made, and no basic or compensatory award is payable to the Claimant. _____________________ Employment Judge Beale KC Date: 13 April 2026 Sent to the parties on: Date: 18 April 2026

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.