Decision date
14 May 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Tobin
Case Summary
The claimant's claim against Salford City College Group was struck out following the claimant's failure to respond to a Tribunal warning letter dated 11 March 2026 that indicated the claim had not been actively pursued. The Tribunal applied Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and determined that striking out was appropriate given the lack of response to the opportunity to explain or request a hearing.
Why this outcome?
Not actively pursuedThe claim was struck out because the claimant failed to respond to a warning letter from the Tribunal dated 11 March 2026 in which the claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, and it appeared to the Tribunal that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •Whether claim should be struck out for lack of active pursuit under Rule 38 of Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 6012050/2025
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 14 May 2026
- Published
- 22 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin