Pantaenius UK Ltd

Case Summary

The claimant applied for reconsideration of a judgment dated 7 April 2026 concerning a dismissal in November 2024. The application was refused because there was no reasonable prospect of the decision being varied or revoked, with the tribunal finding that the claimant's arguments amounted to a second bite at the cherry and did not meet the grounds for reconsideration under rule 68 of the Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.

The tribunal refused reconsideration because the claimant's extensive arguments did not meet the grounds for reconsideration under rule 68, and the application was essentially an attempt to re-argue the case rather than identify overlooked issues or new credible evidence that would have had important influence on the original hearing.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Application for reconsideration of judgment
• •Medical evidence and feasibility of bringing claim sooner
• •Reasonable adjustments
• •Late evidence
• •Managing Director presence at hearing
• •ACAS advice and procedural misunderstanding

The full source document is available from the official publication page.