M&E Pro Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation)

Case Summary

The claimant's employment claim against M&E Pro Limited was struck out. The respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and no court permission had been obtained to continue the proceedings as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. Additionally, the claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons for the lack of active pursuit of the claim.

The claim was struck out because the respondent company is in compulsory liquidation and court permission has not been obtained to continue the proceedings as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. Additionally, the claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons within the required timeframe as to why the claim, which had not been actively pursued, should not be struck out.

• •Respondent company in compulsory liquidation
• •Failure to obtain court permission to continue proceedings under Insolvency Act 1986
• •Claim not actively pursued

Case No. 6004352/2025 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mark Edwards Respondent: M&E Pro Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The respondent company is in compulsory liquidation. The permission of the court has not been obtained for these proceedings to be continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. 2. On 12 February 2026 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons within 14 days why the claim should not be struck out as it had not been actively pursued. The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Sharp Date: 24 March 2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 24 March 2026 Miriam Drake F FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE