6001129/2024Struck out

The Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police

7 May 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge McTigue

Respondent

The Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police

All cases →

Decision date

7 May 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge McTigue

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against the Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police was struck out under Rules 38(1)(b), (c) and (e) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. The tribunal found the claimant had persistently and deliberately failed to comply with disclosure orders and had conducted proceedings unreasonably, making a fair hearing impossible.

Why this outcome?

Non-compliance with orders

The tribunal found that the claimant had engaged in persistent and deliberate unreasonable conduct by refusing to comply with tribunal disclosure orders, imposing unilateral conditions not permitted by the tribunal, and failing to provide simultaneous disclosure as directed. The magnitude of non-compliance was substantial and the claimant's responsibility, rendering a fair hearing impossible.

Claim Types

Discrimination AgeDiscrimination DisabilityWhistleblowingDiscrimination SexUnlawful Deduction

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

See age discrimination compensation data

Key Issues

  • Non-compliance with tribunal disclosure orders
  • Unreasonable conduct of proceedings
  • Whether fair hearing remained possible

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.