Decision date
7 May 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge McTigue
Case Summary
The claimant's claim against the Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police was struck out under Rules 38(1)(b), (c) and (e) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. The tribunal found the claimant had persistently and deliberately failed to comply with disclosure orders and had conducted proceedings unreasonably, making a fair hearing impossible.
Why this outcome?
Non-compliance with ordersThe tribunal found that the claimant had engaged in persistent and deliberate unreasonable conduct by refusing to comply with tribunal disclosure orders, imposing unilateral conditions not permitted by the tribunal, and failing to provide simultaneous disclosure as directed. The magnitude of non-compliance was substantial and the claimant's responsibility, rendering a fair hearing impossible.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •Non-compliance with tribunal disclosure orders
- •Unreasonable conduct of proceedings
- •Whether fair hearing remained possible
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Leicester Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 6001129/2024
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 7 May 2026
- Published
- 3 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue
- Representation
- Litigant in person