The Home Office and Others
Case Summary
The claimant's claims in direct disability, race, sex and age discrimination, indirect disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, reasonable adjustments, harassment related to disability/race/sex/age, and victimisation all fail and are dismissed.
Why this outcome?
Claim not well-foundedThe tribunal found that the claimant's claims of discrimination, harassment and victimisation under the Equality Act 2010 were not well-founded and were therefore dismissed.
Key Issues
- •direct disability discrimination
- •indirect disability discrimination
- •discrimination arising from disability
- •reasonable adjustments
- •harassment related to disability/race/sex/age
- •victimisation
Claim Types
Cited Laws and Legal Issues
The claimant's claims in direct disability, race, sex and age discrimination, indirect disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, reasonable adjustments, harassment related to disability/race/sex/age, and victimisation all fail and are dismissed.
Related Cases
Decision Text
; 3315289/2023. 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondents Mr J Mangrola v (1) The Home Office (3311616/2023); (2) Ms Patricia Fitzmaurice (3311616/2023); (3) Ms Claire Faxon (3311616/2023); (4) Ms Gabrielle Monk (3315289/2023); (5) Mr Ian Crocker (3315289/2203); (6) Mr Christopher Edwards (3315289/2023) Heard at: Bury St Edmunds (part in person, part by CVP) On: 23, 24, 25, 26 and 27 June 2025 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21 and 22 January 2026 (13 days including days of deliberation, Judgment writing and delivery of an extemporary Judgment) Before: Employment Judge K J Palmer Members: Mr B McSweeney and Mr C Grant Appearances For the Claimants: In person For the Respondent: Mr Harris (Counsel) JUDGMENT 1. It is the unanimous Judgment of this Tribunal that the Claimant’s claims in direct disability, race, sex and age discrimination under s.13 of the Equality Act 2010 fail and are dismissed. 2. The Claimant’s claims in indirect disability discrimination under s.19 of the Equality Act 2010 fail and are dismissed. 3. The Claimant’s claims in discrimination arising from disability under s.15 of the Equality Act 2010 fail and are dismissed. ; 3315289/2023. 2 4. The Claimant’s claims in reasonable adjustments under S.20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 fail and are dismissed. 5. The Claimant’s claims in harassment related to disability / race / sex / age, under s.26 of the Equality Act 2010 fail and are dismissed. 6. The Claimant’s claims in victimisation under s.27 of the Equality Act 2010 all fail and are dismissed. 7. The Claimant’s claims fail and all are dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge K J Palmer Date: 23 January 2026 Sent to the parties on: . 16 March 2026 ...
Employer
Case Details
- Case Number
- 3311616/2023
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision Date
- 23/01/2026
- Published
- 13/04/2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K J Palmer