Decision date
20 August 2024
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge M Warren
Case Summary
The claimant succeeded in his claim for a protective award against the respondent company that was in administration, for failing to comply with requirements under the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
Why this outcome?
The respondent failed to comply with statutory requirements under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, which govern consultation obligations in redundancy situations. The tribunal found this breach established and awarded protective remuneration accordingly.
Claim Types
Related guide
Unfair dismissal cases won in the UK
Compare this judgment with other successful unfair dismissal cases and controlled win reasons.
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •The Respondent has failed to comply with a requirement of sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The claim for a protective award succeeds.
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Norwich Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 3311180/2023
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 20 August 2024
- Published
- 10 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren
- Representation
- Litigant in person