International Total Services (Holdings) Ltd

Case Summary

The claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal, whistleblowing detriment, unlawful wage deductions, and failure to provide written particulars of employment. The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal and automatic unfair dismissal claims as not well founded, found the detriment claims out of time, but upheld the claims for unlawful deductions (£261.12) and failure to provide written particulars (£2,611.20), awarding a total of £2,872.32.

The tribunal found the unfair dismissal and automatic unfair dismissal claims not well founded on their merits. The detriment claims were rejected on jurisdictional grounds as being out of time. However, the claims for unlawful wage deductions and failure to provide written particulars of employment were upheld as well founded.

• •Unfair dismissal under section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996
• •Automatic unfair dismissal by reason of protected disclosure under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
• •Detriment by reason of public interest disclosure
• •Unlawful deductions of wages under section 13
• •Failure to provide written statement of particulars of employment under section 38 Employment Act 2002

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr Shantos Gurung Respondent: International Total Services (Holdings) Ltd Heard at: Watford Employment Tribunal On: 17- 19 February 2026 Before: Employment Judge Young Non Legal Members: Ms N Kendrick Mr D Wharton Representation Claimant: Litigant in person Respondent: Ms Chloe Lauret (Litigation Consultant) Interpreter: Ms Sangi Gurung JUDGMENT 1. The Claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal under section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is not well founded and is dismissed. 2. The Claimant’s complaint of automatic unfair dismissal by reason of making a protected disclosure under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 is not well founded and is dismissed. 3. The Claimant’s complaints of detriment by reason of making a public interest disclosure are out of time. The Employment Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to consider the complaints. 4. The Claimant’s complaint of unlawful deductions of wages under section 13 is well founded, and the Claimant is awarded £261.12 5. The Claimant’s complaint of failure of the employer to provide a written statement of particulars of employment under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 is well founded, and the Claimant is awarded 4 weeks’ pay amounting to £2,611.20. 6. The Respondent shall pay the Claimant £2,872.32 in total. Approved by: Employment Judge Young 19 February 2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 18 April 2026 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing, or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided…