3301799/2025Struck out

Paxton Hall Care Home

27 February 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Tynan

Respondent

Paxton Hall Care Home

All cases →

Decision date

27 February 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Tynan

Case Summary

The claimant complained of unfair dismissal against Paxton Hall Care Home. The tribunal struck out the complaint because the claimant had less than two years of service, which is a statutory requirement under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for bringing an unfair dismissal claim.

Why this outcome?

No qualifying employment period

The claimant was employed for less than two years, which falls short of the statutory minimum two-year service requirement under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required to bring an unfair dismissal complaint.

Claim Types

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

See unfair dismissal compensation data

Key Issues

  • Whether claimant has qualifying period of two years service for unfair dismissal claim

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.