LRG Employees Ltd

Case Summary

The tribunal dismissed all claims of direct race discrimination, direct disability discrimination, unfavourable treatment due to disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability, victimisation, and automatic unfair dismissal.

The tribunal found that the claimant's claims of direct race discrimination, direct disability discrimination, unfavourable treatment due to disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability, victimisation, and automatic unfair dismissal had no reasonable prospect of success or were rejected on their merits after consideration.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •direct_race_discrimination
• •direct_disability_discrimination
• •unfavourable_treatment_due_to_disability
• •failure_to_make_reasonable_adjustments_for_disability
• •victimisation
• •automatic_unfair_dismissal

& 3303118/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss H Mokhtar Benounane Respondent: LRG Employees Limited Heard at: Reading On: 1, 2, 3 & 4 September 2025 Before: Employment Judge McCooey Mrs C Tufts Mr P Hough REPRESENTATION: Claimant: In person Respondent: Ms N Gyane, Counsel JUDGMENT The unanimous judgment of the Tribunal is as follows: 1. The complaint of direct race discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed. 2. The complaint of direct disability discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed. 3. The complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability is not well-founded and is dismissed. 4. The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability is not well-founded and is dismissed. 5. The complaint of victimisation is not well-founded and is dismissed. 6. The complaint of automatic unfair dismissal is dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. & 3303118/2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT Introduction 7. This was the hearing of a claim of disability discrimination, race discrimination and victimisation. The complaints were presented in two claim forms on 15 January 2024 and 18 March 2024. Early conciliation took place between 14 December 2023 and 15 January 2024. The Respondent filed a response defending the complaints on 8 March 2024 and further amened responses on 20 January 2025 and 18 February 2025. Procedural matters 8. Two case management hearings had taken place. The first was on the 30 September 2024, at which the claims were discussed and a draft list of issues prepared. The claimant sought further information from the respondent on 19 December 2024 and 21 January 2025. 9. A second case management hearing took place on 28 January 2025, at which the claims were discussed and the list of issues clarified further. 10. Following that second hearing, the…