Decision date
3 March 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Cawthray
Case Summary
The Tribunal struck out the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, automatically unfair dismissal (protected disclosure), and protected disclosure detriment. The unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant lacked sufficient qualifying service, and the protected disclosure complaints were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success with no discernible basis in the claim form. The direct race discrimination complaint continues.
Why this outcome?
No qualifying employment periodThe unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant did not have sufficient service to bring such a complaint. The protected disclosure complaints were struck out under Rule 38 because there was no reasonable prospect of success and no discernible basis in the claim form.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
See race discrimination compensation dataKey Issues
- •Striking out of unfair dismissal claim due to lack of qualifying service
- •Striking out of automatically unfair dismissal (protected disclosure) claim due to no reasonable prospect of success
- •Striking out of protected disclosure detriment claim due to no reasonable prospect of success
- •Continuation of direct race discrimination complaint
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 2309578/2024
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 3 March 2026
- Published
- 15 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cawthray