2302797/2022

Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

v Ms N Gray

4 January 2024·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales

Respondent

Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

All cases →

Decision date

4 January 2024

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Cited Laws

Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissalEmployment Rights Act 1996

She has brought various complaints against the Respondent, of: 2 of 60 a) Constructive unfair dismissal; and b) Disability discrimination.

Equality Act 2010 disability discriminationEquality Act 2010

has brought various complaints against the Respondent, of: 2 of 60 a) Constructive unfair dismissal; and b) Disability discrimination.

Working Time Regulations 1998Working Time Regulations 1998

m scheduled for 17 February 2021; d) From March 2020 onwards, the Claimant could have been given ten minute rest breaks every hour; e) From March 2021 onwards, the Claimant could have been permitted to deliver project work; f) From March 2021 onwards, the Claimant could have been permitted to deliver theoretical...

Decision Text

Full PDF

1 of 60 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Heard at: London South On: 2 nd to 6 th October 2023 Claimant: Ms N Gray Respondent: Surrey & Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Before: Employment Judge Ramsden With members Mr A Fairbank Mr R Singh Representation: Claimant Mr A Johnston Respondent Mr A Ross, Counsel RESERVED JUDGMENT 1. The Claimant’s claims are not well-founded and are dismissed. REASONS Background 2. The Respondent is an NHS trust which provides healthcare service to the population of Surrey and beyond. 3. The Claimant worked for the Respondent for 28 years, ultimately in a senior position within the Violence Reduction (VR) team. The Claimant’s employment as a Senior VR Trainer ended on 18 May 2022. Early conciliation started and ended on 26 May 2022, and the Claimant presented her claim form on 15 August 2022. She has brought various complaints against the Respondent, of: 2 of 60 a) Constructive unfair dismissal; and b) Disability discrimination. 4. The issues to be decided in the substantive hearing to determine the Claimant’s claims were set out in the Case Management Orders of EJ A Frazer on 24 April 2023. 5. The essence of the Claimant’s claims are that the Respondent failed to manage her disability, namely the breast cancer with which she was first diagnosed in 2017. She says that the Respondent failed to heed the recommendations in occupational health (OH) reports, failed to make reasonable adjustments and did not provide redress to her grievance. She resigned, on notice, in circumstances which she says amounted to a fundamental breach of her contract by the Respondent. 6. More specifically, the Claimant alleges: a) Constructive unfair dismissal; b) Direct disability discrimination, under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 (the 2010 Act); c) Discrimination arising from disability, under section 15 of the 2010 Act; d) Failure to mak

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.