SRCL Ltd

Case Summary

Miss E Gresley brought claims against SRCL Limited for direct discrimination on grounds of disability, age and sex, harassment, failure to make reasonable adjustments, unfair dismissal, and unauthorised wage deductions. The tribunal found that all of the claimant's complaints were not well founded and dismissed them.

The tribunal found that the claimant failed to establish her claims on the balance of probabilities. The evidence presented did not support her allegations of discrimination, harassment, or unfair dismissal against the respondent employer.

• •Direct disability discrimination
• •Direct age discrimination
• •Direct sex discrimination
• •Harassment related to disability, age and sex
• •Discrimination arising out of disability
• •Failure to make reasonable adjustments
• •Ordinary unfair dismissal
• •Notice pay
• •Unauthorised deduction from wages

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss. E. Gresley Respondent: SRCL Limited Heard at: London South Employment Tribunal (hybrid) On: 16 th , 17 th , 18 th , 19 th , 20 th , 23 rd February, 5 th , 6 th and 9 th March 2026 1 Before: Employment Judge Sudra (sitting alone) Appearances: Claimant: In-Person (unrepresented but accompanied by her mother and grandmother) Respondent: Ms. A. Greenley of Counsel (References in the form [B1/XX] are to page numbers in the First Hearing bundle. References in the form [B2/XX] are to page numbers in the Second Hearing bundle. References in the form [XX,para.X] are to the paragraph of the named (by initials) witnesses’ witness statement) RESERVED JUDGMENT The decision of the Tribunal is that the Claimant’s complaints of, (i) Direct disability discrimination is not well founded and stands dismissed. 1 6 th and 9 th March 2026 in Chambers. 2 (ii) Direct age discrimination is not well founded and stands dismissed. (iii) Direct sex discrimination is not well founded and stands dismissed. (iv) Harassment related to disability is not well founded and stands dismissed. (v) Harassment related to age is not well founded and stands dismissed. (vi) Harassment related to sex is not well founded and stands dismissed. (vii) Discrimination arising out of disability is not well founded and stands dismissed. (viii) Failure to make reasonable adjustments is not well founded and stands dismissed. (ix) ‘Ordinary’ unfair dismissal is not well founded and stands dismissed. (x) Notice pay is not well founded and stands dismissed. (xi) Unauthorised deduction from wages is not well founded and stands dismissed. REASONS 1. The Claimant began Acas early conciliation on 27 th March 2023 (‘Day A’) and was issued with an Acas early conciliation certificate on 8 th May 2023 (‘Day B’). On 8 th June 2023 the Claimant pr…