BPP University Ltd and Others

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Case No: 2302566/2022 10.5 Reserved judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS First Claimant: Ms Petia Paramova-Castano Second Claimant: Ms Tamara Shengelia Third Claimant: Ms Anne Gayani Fernando First Respondent: BPP University Limited Second Respondent Ms Sarah Mcilroy Third Respondent Ms Sally-Ann Burnett Fourth Respondent Mr. Garry Buick Heard at: London South, by video On: 19 January 2024 Before: Employment Judge G Cawthray Representation First and Third Claimant: Ms. M Bouffe, Counsel Second Claimant: Dr Chandra, legally qualified in India (does not practice in the UK) – Second Claimant’s husband The Respondents: Mr. K Wilson, Counsel RESERVED JUDGMENT (Strike out and deposit order) 1. The Respondents application for strike out of alleged protected disclosures 2.1.1.10, 2.1.1.12, 2.1.1.13, 2.1.1.16, 2.1.1.22 and 2.1.1.24 is dismissed. 2. The Respondents application for a deposit order in relation to alleged protected disclosures 2.1.1.10, 2.1.1.12, 2.1.1.13, 2.1.1.16, 2.1.1.22 and 2.1.1.24 is dismissed. 3. The Respondents application for strike out of the complaints of indirect sex and indirect race discrimination, issues 12 and 13 in the List of Issues, are dismissed. Case No: 2302566/2022 10.5 Reserved judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017 4. The Second Claimant is ordered to pay a deposit order in accordance with the separate deposit order of the same date, in relation to indirect sex and indirect race discrimination, issues 12 and 13 in the List of Issues. REASONS Introduction 1. The hearing today was a public preliminary hearing that had been listed by Employment Judge Clarke following a preliminary hearing on 2 October 2023. A case management preliminary hearing had also taken place on 10 May 2023. 2. I was provided with the followin…