2300816/2022Respondent Successful

The Kemnal Academies Trust

v Mr N Bola

11 March 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Andrews

Respondent

The Kemnal Academies Trust

All cases →

Decision date

11 March 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Andrews

Case Summary

The claimant, a maths teacher and Director of Mathematics, claimed unfair dismissal and disability discrimination following termination on grounds of incapability due to ill-health. The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim failed but upheld four disability discrimination complaints relating to breaches of the duty to make reasonable adjustments and one count of harassment. Remedy was deferred to a hearing on 23 June 2026.

Why this outcome?

Dismissal found fair

The unfair dismissal claim failed because the respondent had a fair reason for dismissal (capability/ill-health) and followed a fair procedure in reaching its decision. The disability discrimination claims partially succeeded because the respondent breached its duty to make reasonable adjustments in relation to specific incidents on 6 May 2021, 7 May 2021, 14 May 2021, and 22 November 2021, and one of these incidents also constituted harassment.

Key Issues

  • Whether dismissal on grounds of capability (ill-health) was fair
  • Whether respondent followed fair procedure in dismissal
  • Whether disability discrimination complaints succeeded
  • Duty to make reasonable adjustments
  • Harassment arising from disability
  • When respondent acquired knowledge of claimant's disabilities (ADHD, autistic spectrum disorder, dyspraxia and anxiety)

Cited Laws

Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissalEmployment Rights Act 1996

The claimant, a maths teacher and Director of Mathematics, claimed unfair dismissal and disability discrimination following termination on grounds of incapability due to ill-health.

Equality Act 2010 disability discriminationEquality Act 2010

The claimant, a maths teacher and Director of Mathematics, claimed unfair dismissal and disability discrimination following termination on grounds of incapability due to ill-health.

Equality Act 2010 race discriminationEquality Act 2010

aimant referred to having sought legal advice specifically with regard to possible claims of disability and race discrimination in the Employment Tribunal.

Equality Act 2010 sex / pregnancy discriminationEquality Act 2010

sic test was set out in Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber Von Hartz (case 170/84) [1984] IRLR 317 in the context of indirect sex discrimination.

Protected disclosures / whistleblowingEmployment Rights Act 1996

Our grievance and whistleblowing procedures are in place for a reason to protect and assist both parties to address and resolve

Decision Text

Full PDF

1 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL SITTING AT: LONDON SOUTH BEFORE: EMPLOYMENT JUDGE ANDREWS MEMBERS: Mr M Cann Ms J Jerram BETWEEN: Mr N Bola Claimant and The Kemnal Academies Trust Respondent ON: 10 November 2025 – 5 December 2025 (excl 3 & 4 December) 8-10 December 2025 and 13 & 14 January 2026 in chambers Appearances: For the Claimant: In person For the Respondent: Mr C Crow, Counsel LIABILITY JUDGMENT The unanimous decision of the Tribunal is that: 1) The complaint of unfair dismissal fails and is dismissed. 2) The following complaints of disability discrimination succeed: a) the suggestion on 6 May 2021 that the claimant should meet with Ms Vellai and Mr Narain was a breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments; b) the failure to notify the claimant of changes to his class due on 7 May 2021 was a breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments and arose from his disability; 2 c) the inaccurate comment on 14 May 2021 regarding the claimant’s marking was a breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments and harassment; and d) sending an email to the claimant from a generic email address on 22 November 2021 was a breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments and arose from his disability. 3) The remaining complaints of disability discrimination fail and are dismissed. 4) Remedy will be considered at a hearing on 23 June 2026. Directions for that hearing and further details appear below. REASONS 1. By a claim form submitted on 28 February 2022, the claimant says that he has been unfairly dismissed and subjected to various types of disability discrimination. The respondent says that the dismissal was by reason of the claimant’s capability and was fair. It accepts that the claimant was disabled at the relevant times by reason of ADHD, autistic spectrum disorder, dyspr

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.