1805109/2025Struck Out

Prestige Recruitment Specialists Ltd

v Mr R Tayib

23 March 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Maidment

Respondent

Prestige Recruitment Specialists Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

23 March 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Maidment

Case Summary

Mr R Tayib brought claims of unfair dismissal, race/religion discrimination, disability discrimination, breach of contract, and unlawful wage deductions against his employer Prestige Recruitment Specialists Ltd. The tribunal struck out all claims as having no reasonable prospects of success after the claimant failed to respond to strike out warnings.

Why this outcome?

No reasonable prospects

The claims were struck out because they were subject to strike out warnings and the claimant made no representations as to why the claims should not be struck out, and the tribunal considered all complaints to have no reasonable prospects of success.

Key Issues

  • unfair dismissal
  • discrimination because of race/religion
  • disability discrimination
  • breach of contract
  • unauthorised deductions from wages and holiday pay

Decision Text

Full PDF

Case No: 1805109/2025 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 March 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr R Tayib Respondent: Prestige Recruitment Specialists Ltd Heard at: Hull On: 23 March 2026 Before: Employment Judge Maidment Representation Claimant: In person Interpreter: Mr Y Ahmed Respondent: Ms L Howes, Solicitor JUDGMENT 1. The claimant’s complaints of unfair dismissal, discrimination because of race/religion, breach of contract, unauthorised deductions from wages and holiday pay are struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success. All such claims were subject to strike out warnings, where the claimant made no representations as to why the claims should not be struck out. 2. The claimant’s complaints of disability discrimination are struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success. Employment Judge Maidment Date 23 March 2026 Notes Case No: 1805109/2025 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 March 2017 Summary reasons for the judgment have been separately provided. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments (apart from judgments under rule 51) and reasons for the judgments (other than summary reasons) are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. Recording and Transcription Please note that if a Tribunal hearing has been recorded you may request a transcript of the recording, for which a charge may be payable. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be che

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.