1403637/2023Dismissed

Staffline Recruitment Ltd and Others

v Ms S Altun

7 March 2025·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Hay

Respondent

Staffline Recruitment Ltd and Others

All cases →

Decision date

7 March 2025

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Hay

Case Summary

The case involved claims of unfair dismissal, harassment, direct discrimination, victimisation, and unauthorised wage deductions. All complaints were dismissed.

Why this outcome?

Claim not well-founded

The tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's complaints including unfair dismissal, harassment, direct discrimination, victimisation, and unauthorised wage deductions, indicating the claims were not well-founded on their merits following a full hearing.

Key Issues

  • unfair dismissal
  • harassment related to race and religious belief
  • direct discrimination on the grounds of race and religious belief
  • victimisation
  • unauthorised deductions from wages

Decision Text

Full PDF

Case No: 1403637/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms S Altun Respondent: (1) Staffline Recruitment Ltd, (2) Magdalena Stasiewicz, (3) Zeina Haddad, (4) Agneiszka Fertykowska, and (5)Matthew Snow Heard at: Southampton Employment Tribunal On: 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 February, 6 & 7 March 2025 Before: Employment Judge Hay Mr L Wakeman Mr J Ruddick Representation Claimant: in person Respondent: (1) Staffline Recuitment Ltd, (2) Magdalena Stasiewicz and (3) Zeina Haddad – Ms Cashell Counsel (4) Angeiszka Fertykowska and (5) Matthew Snow – Mr MacDonald Counsel JUDGMENT 1. The complaint of unfair dismissal is not well-founded and is dismissed. 2. The complaints of harassment related to race and religious belief are not well-founded and are dismissed. 3. The complaints of direct discrimination on the grounds of race and religious belief are not well-founded and are dismissed. 4. The complaints of victimisation are not well-founded and are dismissed. 5. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is not well founded and is dismissed. Case No: 1403637/2023 _____________________________ Employment Judge Hay Date: 7 March 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 21 March 2025 Jade Lobb FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Note Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons will not be provided unless a party asked for them at the hearing or a party makes a written request within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments (apart from judgments under rule 52) and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.