B and M Retail Ltd
Case Summary
The Claimant was disabled by virtue of a lung condition. He had received letters from Public Health England that he was deemed clinically extremely vulnerable to COVID as a result of his disability. He was required by the Respondent to attend work during the pandemic. The Claimant requested to be absent from work on furlough as a reasonable adjustment. This was refused by the Respondent, but the Claimant was given the option of remaining off work shielding on statutory sick pay. The Employment Tribunal ("the ET") dismissed his claims for indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, unfair dismissal and victimisation.
Key Issues
- •disability discrimination – sections 19 and 20 Equality Act 2010
- •unfair dismissal
- •wrongful dismissal
Claim Types
Cited Laws and Legal Issues
ribunal ("the ET") dismissed his claims for indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, unfair dismissal and victimisation.
The Employment Tribunal ("the ET") dismissed his claims for indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, unfair dismissal and victimisation.
Related Cases
Decision Text
Judgment approved by the court for handing down Duke v B & M Retail Ltd © EAT 2025 Page 1 [2025] EAT 195 Neutral Citation Number: [2025] EAT 195 Case No: EA-2023-001072-DXA EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Rolls Building Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 23 December 2025 Before: HIS HONOUR JUDGE TARIQ SADIQ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: MR NEIL DUKE Appellant - and – B & M RETAIL LIMITED Respondent - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr Lee Bronze (instructed by USDAW) for the Appellant Mr Stefan Brochwicz-Lewinski (instructed by Horsfield Menzies) for the Respondent Hearing date: 25 September 2025 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Judgment approved by the court for handing down Duke v B & M Retail Ltd © EAT 2025 Page 2 [2025] EAT 195 SUMMARY Disability discrimination – sections 19 and 20 Equality Act 2010 Unfair dismissal Wrongful dismissal The Claimant was disabled by virtue of a lung condition. He had received letters from Public Health England that he was deemed clinically extremely vulnerable to COVID as a result of his disability. He was required by the Respondent to attend work during the pandemic. The Claimant requested to be absent from work on furlough as a reasonable adjustment. This was refused by the Respondent, but the Claimant was given the option ...
Employer
Case Details
- Case Number
- [2025] EAT 195
- Appeal result
- Appeal outcome unclear · Remitted
- Tribunal
- Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Level
- Appeal
- Decision Date
- 23/12/2025
- Published
- 23/12/2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- His Honour Judge Tariq Sadiq