Back to search
[2025] EAT 195Appeal outcome unclearPartially Successful

B and M Retail Ltd

23 December 2025England & WalesHis Honour Judge Tariq Sadiq
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The Claimant was disabled by virtue of a lung condition. He had received letters from Public Health England that he was deemed clinically extremely vulnerable to COVID as a result of his disability. He was required by the Respondent to attend work during the pandemic. The Claimant requested to be absent from work on furlough as a reasonable adjustment. This was refused by the Respondent, but the Claimant was given the option of remaining off work shielding on statutory sick pay. The Employment Tribunal ("the ET") dismissed his claims for indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, unfair dismissal and victimisation.

Key Issues

  • disability discrimination – sections 19 and 20 Equality Act 2010
  • unfair dismissal
  • wrongful dismissal

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissalEmployment Rights Act 1996

ribunal ("the ET") dismissed his claims for indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, unfair dismissal and victimisation.

Equality Act 2010 disability discriminationEquality Act 2010

The Employment Tribunal ("the ET") dismissed his claims for indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, unfair dismissal and victimisation.

Related Cases

Decision Text

Judgment approved by the court for handing down Duke v B & M Retail Ltd © EAT 2025 Page 1 [2025] EAT 195 Neutral Citation Number: [2025] EAT 195 Case No: EA-2023-001072-DXA EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Rolls Building Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 23 December 2025 Before: HIS HONOUR JUDGE TARIQ SADIQ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: MR NEIL DUKE Appellant - and – B & M RETAIL LIMITED Respondent - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr Lee Bronze (instructed by USDAW) for the Appellant Mr Stefan Brochwicz-Lewinski (instructed by Horsfield Menzies) for the Respondent Hearing date: 25 September 2025 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Judgment approved by the court for handing down Duke v B & M Retail Ltd © EAT 2025 Page 2 [2025] EAT 195 SUMMARY Disability discrimination – sections 19 and 20 Equality Act 2010 Unfair dismissal Wrongful dismissal The Claimant was disabled by virtue of a lung condition. He had received letters from Public Health England that he was deemed clinically extremely vulnerable to COVID as a result of his disability. He was required by the Respondent to attend work during the pandemic. The Claimant requested to be absent from work on furlough as a reasonable adjustment. This was refused by the Respondent, but the Claimant was given the option ...

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

B and M Retail Ltd

Employer page →View all cases →

Case Details

Case Number
[2025] EAT 195
Appeal result
Appeal outcome unclear · Remitted
Tribunal
Employment Appeal Tribunal
Level
Appeal
Decision Date
23/12/2025
Published
23/12/2025
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
His Honour Judge Tariq Sadiq