Back to search
1403637/2023Dismissed

Staffline Recruitment Ltd and Others

7 March 2025England & WalesEmployment Judge Hay
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The case involved claims of unfair dismissal, harassment, direct discrimination, victimisation, and unauthorised wage deductions. All complaints were dismissed.

Key Issues

  • unfair dismissal
  • harassment related to race and religious belief
  • direct discrimination on the grounds of race and religious belief
  • victimisation
  • unauthorised deductions from wages

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Employment Rights Act 1996 section 13Employment Rights Act 1996

ll-founded and are dismissed. 5. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is not well founded and is dismissed. Case No:

Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissalEmployment Rights Act 1996

The case involved claims of unfair dismissal, harassment, direct discrimination, victimisation, and

Equality Act 2010 race discriminationEquality Act 2010

l-founded and is dismissed. 2. The complaints of harassment related to race and religious belief are not well-founded and are dism

Decision Text

Case No: 1403637/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms S Altun Respondent: (1) Staffline Recruitment Ltd, (2) Magdalena Stasiewicz, (3) Zeina Haddad, (4) Agneiszka Fertykowska, and (5)Matthew Snow Heard at: Southampton Employment Tribunal On: 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 February, 6 & 7 March 2025 Before: Employment Judge Hay Mr L Wakeman Mr J Ruddick Representation Claimant: in person Respondent: (1) Staffline Recuitment Ltd, (2) Magdalena Stasiewicz and (3) Zeina Haddad – Ms Cashell Counsel (4) Angeiszka Fertykowska and (5) Matthew Snow – Mr MacDonald Counsel JUDGMENT 1. The complaint of unfair dismissal is not well-founded and is dismissed. 2. The complaints of harassment related to race and religious belief are not well-founded and are dismissed. 3. The complaints of direct discrimination on the grounds of race and religious belief are not well-founded and are dismissed. 4. The complaints of victimisation are not well-founded and are dismissed. 5. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is not well founded and is dismissed. Case No: 1403637/2023 _____________________________ Employment Judge Hay Date: 7 March 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 21 March 2025 Jade Lobb FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Note Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons will not be provided unless a party asked for them at the hearing or a party makes a written request within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments (apart from judgments under rule 52) and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-...

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

Staffline Recruitment Ltd and Others

Employer page →View all cases →

Employment Details

Industry
Other
Representation
Litigant in person

Case Details

Case Number
1403637/2023
Decision Date
07/03/2025
Published
10/09/2025
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Hay