Back to search
3309328/2023

Staffline Recruitment Ltd and BMW (UK) Manufacturing Ltd

9 July 2024England & Wales
GOV.UK

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Employment Rights Act 1996 section 13Employment Rights Act 1996

issed as a respondent to the proceedings. The claim of unlawful deduction from wages will continue against the first Respondent only.

Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissalEmployment Rights Act 1996

aims. 1. The claims of disability discrimination and unfair dismissal were brought outside the relevant statutory time limit

Equality Act 2010 disability discriminationEquality Act 2010

as follows: Strike out of claims. 1. The claims of disability discrimination and unfair dismissal were brought outside the relevant

Decision Text

Case No: 3309328/2023 &3309449/2023 10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr S Gibson Respondent: Staffline Recruitment Limited (R1) BMW (UK) Manufacturing Limited (R2) Heard at: Reading ET via CVP On: 8 & 9 July 2024 Before: EJ Milner-Moore Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Mr A Quereshi (Counsel) R1 Ms L Kaye (Counsel) R2 PRELIMINARY HEARING IN PUBLIC JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is as follows: Strike out of claims. 1. The claims of disability discrimination and unfair dismissal were brought outside the relevant statutory time limits and: a. The claimant has no reasonable prospect of establishing that it is just and equitable to extend the time limit for bringing the claim of disability discrimination. The claim is therefore struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a). b. The claimant has no reasonable prospect of establishing that it was not reasonably practicable to comply with the time limit for bringing the claim of unfair dismissal nor that the claim was brought within such further period as was reasonable. The claim is therefore struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a). Disability 2. At the relevant time (i.e. during January and February 2023) the claimant was a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of a chronic heart condition. Case No: 3309328/2023 &3309449/2023 10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017 3. In light of the decisions reached, the Second Respondent is dismissed as a respondent to the proceedings. The claim of unlawful deduction from wages will continue against the first Respondent only. _____________________________________ Employment Judge Milner-Moore Date 9 July 2024 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 07/08/2024 FOR THE TRIB...

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

Staffline Recruitment Ltd and BMW (UK) Manufacturing Ltd

Employer page →View all cases →

Case Details

Case Number
3309328/2023
Decision Date
09/07/2024
Published
15/08/2024
Jurisdiction
England & Wales