Back to search
6012650/2024Respondent Successful

Royal Mail Group Ltd

5 February 2026England & WalesEmployment Judge G. King
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The claimant's claims of Unfair Dismissal and Direct Race Discrimination were dismissed.

Key Issues

  • Unfair Dismissal
  • Direct Race Discrimination

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissalEmployment Rights Act 1996

The claimant's claims of Unfair Dismissal and Direct Race Discrimination were dismissed.

Equality Act 2010 race discriminationEquality Act 2010

The claimant's claims of Unfair Dismissal and Direct Race Discrimination were dismissed.

Decision Text

Case No: 6012650/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr G. Lohia Respondent: Royal Mail Group Ltd Heard at: Bristol ET On: 4 and 5 February 2026 Before: Employment Judge: Mr G. King Members: Mrs C. Monaghan Ms J. Kaye Representation For the Claimant: Mr Fry – lay representative For the Respondent: Ms Martin – solicitor JUDGMENT 1. The Claimant’s claim of Unfair Dismissal is not well founded and is dismissed. 2. The Claimant’s claim of Direct Race Discrimination is not well founded and is dismissed. Approved by Employment Judge G. King Date: 5 February 2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 09 March 2026 Case No: 6012650/2024 Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. Recording and Transcription Please note that if a Tribunal hearing has been recorded you may request a transcript of the recording, for which a charge may be payable. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings, and accompanying...

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

Royal Mail Group Ltd

Employer page →View all cases →

Case Details

Case Number
6012650/2024
Decision Date
05/02/2026
Published
01/04/2026
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge G. King