R1 and R2

. 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Claimant v (1) R1; (2) R2. Heard at: Cambridge On: 29, 30 April 2024 and 1, 2, 3 May 2024 (by CVP) 9 – 12 December 2024 and 16 – 18 December 2024 20 December 2024 (in person) and 27-29 January 2025 (deliberations, no parties in attendance) Before: Employment Judge M Ord Members: Ms C Baggs and Ms S Jenkins Appearances For the Claimant: In person For the Respondents: Ms S Bowen, Counsel (29 April – 3 May 2024 incl.) Mr C Ludlow, Counsel (9 – 20 December 2024 incl.) RESERVED JUDGMENT 1. It is the unanimous decision of the Employment Tribunal that the Claimant’s complaints: 1.1. that he was unfairly dismissed; 1.2. that he was the victim of unlawful discrimination on the protected characteristic of sex; and 1.3. that he was the victim of unlawful discrimination on the protected characteristic of race; are not well founded and the claim is dismissed. . 2 REASONS Background and Progress of the Case to its Final Hearing 1. The Claimant was employed by the First Respondent from 5 March 2018 to 17 November 2021 when he resigned with immediate effect. 2. The Claimant’s substantive role was as a Support Worker working in Ward K at the First Respondent’s premises. In December 2020 he began additional work as a Sessional / Flexible Worker on Ward E. 3. The Claimant was the subject of allegations of inappropriate behaviour on Ward E, made first on 3 July 2021 by Complainant 2 and Complainant 4 (which allegations they later amplified), from the Second Respondent on 7 July 2021 and from Complainant 3 on 8 July 2021. 4. ...