8001321/2025Partial success

The Highland Council

23 March 2026·Employment Tribunal·Scotland·Employment Judge M Kearns

Respondent

The Highland Council

All cases →

Decision date

23 March 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

Scotland

Judge

Employment Judge M Kearns

Case Summary

The claimant, aged 68, was dismissed from his role as harbour master at Uig harbour by The Highland Council. The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair due to procedural defects: the disciplinary officer (Mrs Urry) was biased having been involved in the investigation, and the claimant was not provided with underlying evidence before the hearing. However, despite finding unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded zero compensation, reducing both basic and compensatory awards to nil due to the claimant's serious misconduct in claiming numerous false overtime payments for slipway cleaning he did not perform and conduct relating to fuel discrepancies.

Why this outcome?

Dismissal found fair

The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair because the procedure used fell outside the band of reasonable procedures: the disciplinary decision-maker (Mrs Urry) was biased having been involved in the investigation and informed of findings before the hearing, and the claimant was not provided with the underlying evidence (Masternaut analysis, timesheets, and tide tables) necessary to prepare his defence. However, no compensation was awarded because the claimant's serious misconduct in claiming numerous false overtime payments for slipway cleaning he admittedly did not perform, coupled with other misconduct regarding fuel and equipment, justified reducing the basic award to nil under section 122(2) ERA and the compensatory award to nil as the claimant had not mitigated and contributed substantially to his own dismissal.

Claim Types

Related guide

Unfair dismissal cases won in the UK

Compare this judgment with other successful unfair dismissal cases and controlled win reasons.

Open examples

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • Whether dismissal was procedurally fair
  • Bias of disciplinary decision-maker (Mrs Urry)
  • Failure to disclose underlying evidence to claimant
  • Fictitious overtime claims for slipway cleaning
  • Fuel discrepancies and alleged fuel theft
  • Removal of glass from works van without permission
  • Claimed theft of red diesel
  • Reduction of basic and compensatory awards for misconduct

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.