Schab Ltd

Case Summary

The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because she lacked the necessary two years' service at the date of dismissal. The claimant did not respond to the tribunal's warning letter, so the claim was struck out. Other claims for sums owed on dismissal remain unaffected.

The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because the claimant did not have the necessary two years' service at the date of her dismissal, and she failed to respond to the tribunal's warning letter dated 20 January 2026.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Whether claimant had two years' service required for unfair dismissal claim

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant:Rajbir Kaur Respondent:Schab Limited JUDGMENT Rule 38(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 The complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 20 January 2026 warning her that the Tribunal was considering striking out the complaint of unfair dismissal. That was because she did not have the necessary two years’ service at the date of her dismissal. 2. The date for a reply, 26 January 2026, has now passed, and no response has been received. 3. That part of the claim is therefore struck out. The rest of the claim is not affected by this judgment. The remaining claims are for sums owed on dismissal. Employment Judge Fowell Date 16 April 2026 JUDGMENT & REASONS SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 25 April 2026 For the Tribunal Office P Wing