6046346/2025Struck out

PAB Coventry Ltd

22 May 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Camp

Respondent

PAB Coventry Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

22 May 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Camp

Case Summary

The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success. The claimant lacked the minimum two years' service required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and did not fall within any of the exceptions set out in section 108(3). The claimant failed to respond to a strike-out warning letter and the claim was therefore struck out.

Why this outcome?

No qualifying employment period

The claimant was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint because she lacked the minimum two years' service required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and did not fall within any of the statutory exceptions. The claim had no reasonable prospects of success.

Claim Types

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • Whether claimant has two years' service required under ERA section 108 to bring unfair dismissal complaint

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.