Decision date
22 May 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Camp
Case Summary
The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success. The claimant lacked the minimum two years' service required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and did not fall within any of the exceptions set out in section 108(3). The claimant failed to respond to a strike-out warning letter and the claim was therefore struck out.
Why this outcome?
No qualifying employment periodThe claimant was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint because she lacked the minimum two years' service required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and did not fall within any of the statutory exceptions. The claim had no reasonable prospects of success.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •Whether claimant has two years' service required under ERA section 108 to bring unfair dismissal complaint
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 6046346/2025
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 22 May 2026
- Published
- 24 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp