6043800/2025Struck out

Soteria Children Services

20 March 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Broughton

Respondent

Soteria Children Services

All cases →

Decision date

20 March 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Broughton

Case Summary

The claimant brought an unfair dismissal complaint against Soteria Children Services. The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant had been employed for less than two years, which is the minimum qualifying period required under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Why this outcome?

No qualifying employment period

The claimant lacked the required two years of service to bring an unfair dismissal claim under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and therefore was not entitled to bring the proceedings.

Claim Types

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • Whether claimant had requisite two years service for unfair dismissal claim

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page. Tribunal Intel does not republish the raw judgment text inline.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.