Scruffy Dog Productions Ltd

Case Summary

The claimant's application for interim relief under Section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996 is dismissed as not well-founded.

The tribunal found that the claimant's application for interim relief lacked merit and did not meet the necessary legal requirements under Section 128 ERA 1996.

• •interim relief under Section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr Yanik Leleu Respondent: Scruffy Dog Productions Limited Heard at: East London Hearing Centre (by CVP) On: 10 December 2025 Before: Employment Judge Gardiner Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Mr Dylan Lardner-Burke, Managing Director JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is that:- The Claimant’s application for interim relief under Section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996 is not well founded and is therefore dismissed. Employment Judge Gardiner Dated: 11 December 2025 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions All judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.