Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd

Case Summary

Claimant's application for interim relief was refused by the tribunal. The tribunal did not find it likely that the dismissal was for a reason specified in section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

The tribunal refused the application for interim relief because it was not satisfied that it was likely the dismissal was for a reason specified in section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (protected disclosure/whistleblowing).

• •Interim relief application under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A Kaltzidis Respondent: Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd Heard at: London Central (by cvp) On: 12 November 2025 Appearances For the claimant: In person For the respondent: Mr A Bachu (counsel) JUDGMENT It does not appear to the Tribunal that it is likely that on determining the complaint to which the application relates the Tribunal will find that the reason (or if more than one the principal reason) for the dismissal is that specified in section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996. The application for interim relief is therefore refused. Approved by: Employment Judge Emery 12 November 2025 SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 26 November 2025 ..................................................................... ................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE