Back to search
6036463/2025unknown

Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd

12 November 2025England & WalesEmployment Judge Emery
GOV.UK

Case Summary

Claimant's application for interim relief was refused by the tribunal. The tribunal did not find it likely that the dismissal was for a reason specified in section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Key Issues

  • Interim relief application under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Protected disclosures / whistleblowingEmployment Rights Act 1996

likely that the dismissal was for a reason specified in section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Decision Text

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A Kaltzidis Respondent: Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd Heard at: London Central (by cvp) On: 12 November 2025 Appearances For the claimant: In person For the respondent: Mr A Bachu (counsel) JUDGMENT It does not appear to the Tribunal that it is likely that on determining the complaint to which the application relates the Tribunal will find that the reason (or if more than one the principal reason) for the dismissal is that specified in section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996. The application for interim relief is therefore refused. Approved by: Employment Judge Emery 12 November 2025 SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 26 November 2025 ..................................................................... ................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd

Employer page →View all cases →

Employment Details

Industry
retail
Representation
Litigant in person

Case Details

Case Number
6036463/2025
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Level
First instance
Decision Date
12/11/2025
Published
02/01/2026
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Emery