6035147/2025Default judgment

AHK Security Solutions

28 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Braganza KC

Respondent

AHK Security Solutions

All cases →

Decision date

28 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Braganza KC

Case Summary

The claimant claimed unauthorised deduction of wages against AHK Security Solutions. The respondent failed to respond to the claim. The tribunal granted judgment in the claimant's favour under Rule 22 for the unopposed claim, with remedy to be assessed following submission of supporting evidence.

Why this outcome?

Default — respondent did not respond

The claim succeeded under Rule 22 because the respondent failed to submit a response to the claim, resulting in a default judgment in the claimant's favour. Remedy is to be determined once the claimant provides supporting evidence.

Claim Types

Unlawful Deduction

Related calculator

Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.

Estimate compensation for unpaid wages claims

Key Issues

  • unauthorised deduction of wages
  • default judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.