Decision date
28 April 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Braganza KC
Case Summary
The claimant claimed unauthorised deduction of wages against AHK Security Solutions. The respondent failed to respond to the claim. The tribunal granted judgment in the claimant's favour under Rule 22 for the unopposed claim, with remedy to be assessed following submission of supporting evidence.
Why this outcome?
Default — respondent did not respondThe claim succeeded under Rule 22 because the respondent failed to submit a response to the claim, resulting in a default judgment in the claimant's favour. Remedy is to be determined once the claimant provides supporting evidence.
Claim Types
Related calculator
Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.
Estimate compensation for unpaid wages claimsKey Issues
- •unauthorised deduction of wages
- •default judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at London South Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 6035147/2025
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 28 April 2026
- Published
- 1 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Braganza KC
- Representation
- Litigant in person