Safran Seats GB Wales

Case Summary

Mr A Kamal claimed unfair dismissal against Safran Seats GB Wales. The tribunal struck out and dismissed the claim because the claimant had less than two years' service, meaning the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the claim. The claimant's response to the strike out warning was insufficient as it failed to explain how jurisdiction could be established.

The claim was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service with the respondent, which means the tribunal lacks jurisdiction to hear an unfair dismissal claim. The claimant's response to the strike out warning did not adequately address or explain how jurisdiction could be established.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Tribunal jurisdiction
• •Qualifying period for unfair dismissal claim

1 of 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Respondent: Mr A Kamal Safran Seats GB Wales JUDGMENT The claim of unfair dismissal is struck out and dismissed on the grounds that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim as the Claimant has less than two years’ service. The Claimant’s response to the strike out warning issued on 22 September 2026 was insufficient in that it failed to explain how the Tribunal had jurisdiction. Approved by Employment Judge Sharp Dated: 8 April 2026 ORDER SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 16 April 2026 Katie Dickson FOR THE SECRETARY TO EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS