House on the Hill

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against House on the Hill was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal gave the claimant notice on 12 January 2026 that it was considering striking out the claim due to lack of active pursuit, but the claimant did not respond to the opportunity to explain or request a hearing.

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's warning letter of 12 January 2026 which gave them an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •claim not actively pursued

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss L Dear Respondent: House on the hill JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 12 January 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued. 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Burge Date: 17 th March 2026 Judgment sent to parties on: Date: 25 th April 2026 For the Tribunal Office