Advanced Innergy Group Ltd

Case Summary

The claimant was dismissed for gross misconduct, and his claims for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were dismissed.

The tribunal found the claimant's dismissal for gross misconduct was fair and lawful, rejecting both the unfair dismissal complaint and the wrongful dismissal claim on their merits following a full hearing.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •gross misconduct
• •fair dismissal
• •notice pay

Case No: 6025921/2025 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A Hisherick Respondent: Advanced Innergy Group Limited Heard at: London East Employment Tribunal On: 19 & 20 November 2025 Before: Employment Judge Bradford Representation Claimant: Mr A Ohringer, Counsel Respondent: Mr A Roberts, Counsel JUDGMENT 1. The Claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal brought under Part X Employment Rights Act 1996 is not well-founded and is dismissed. 2. The Claimant’s claim for wrongful dismissal is not well-founded and is dismissed. REASONS 1. In this case the Claimant, Mr Hisherik, claims that he has been unfairly dismissed, and brings a claim of breach of contract for his notice pay. The respondent contends that the reason for the dismissal was gross misconduct, that the dismissal was fair, and no notice pay was due as the Claimant was summarily dismissed. 2. This has been a remote hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was by Cloud Video Platform. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, and all issues could be determined in a remote hearing. The order made is described above. Case No: 6025921/2025 3. I have heard from the Claimant, and for the Respondent I have heard from Mr John Drury, Chief Commercial Officer and Mr Andrew Bennion, Chief Executive Officer. 4. There was a degree of conflict on the evidence. I found the following facts proven on the balance of probabilities after considering the whole of the evidence, both oral and documentary, and after listening to the factual and legal submissions made by and on behalf of the respective p…