Uber

Case Summary

The claimant's claim of unfair dismissal is struck out as the claimant was employed for less than two years and therefore is not entitled to bring such proceedings.

The claimant was employed for less than two years and therefore does not meet the statutory qualifying period required to bring an unfair dismissal claim under employment law.

• •Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years' service to make an unfair dismissal complaint
• •The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years
• •The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out

each EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: M Munir Respondent: Uber JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The claimant complains of unfair dismissal. 2. Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years’ service to make an unfair dismissal complaint. 3. The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years. 4. Therefore, the claimant is not entitled to bring these proceedings. 5. The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out. 6. Accordingly, the claim is struck out. Approved by Employment Judge Tobin Date: 12 January 2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON Date: 12 March 2026 ........................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE