KAMMAC Ltd

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Case No: 6023565/2025 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr Michael Yates Respondent: KAMMAC LIMITED Heard at: Manchester On: 18 February & 18 March 2026 Before: Tribunal Judge Holt REPRESENTATION: Claimant: The Claimant was a litigant in person and his partner Ms Mazule- Kalninam acted as his advocate Respondent: Mr R Pickard (Counsel) JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is that the Claimant’s claims are unfounded. The Claimant’s claims are dismissed for: 1. Breach of contract: The Claim fails and is dismissed. 2. Unfair dismissal: The Claimant did not have two years’ service. 3. Wrongful dismissal: The Claim fails and is dismissed. 4. Unlawful deduction from wages: The Claim fails and is dismissed. 5. Failure to comply with a subject access request: The Tribunal has no jurisdiction over such claims. Tribunal Judge Abigail Holt 18 March 2026 Case No: 6023565/2025 2 SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 30 April 2026 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Notes 1. Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. 2. Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.