6023541/2025Struck out

FEVACA

v L Edmondson

19 May 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Cowen

Respondent

FEVACA

All cases →

Decision date

19 May 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Cowen

Case Summary

The claimant's employment claim was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for failure to comply with a previous tribunal order dated 11 October 2025 and for not actively pursuing the claim. The claimant failed to respond to a warning letter dated 17 April 2026 giving an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out.

Why this outcome?

Non-compliance with orders

The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with a tribunal order dated 11 October 2025, had not actively pursued the claim, and failed to engage with the process to prove disability or identify the claims, as well as failing to respond to the tribunal's warning letter.

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • non-compliance with tribunal order dated 11 October 2025
  • failure to actively pursue claim
  • failure to engage with process to prove disability or identify claims

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Liam Edmondson Respondent: FEVACA JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 17 April 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that  you have not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 11 October 2025; and  the claim had not been actively pursued. 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. I am satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claim under Rule 38 apply, and that it would be in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3 to strike out the claim. This is because the claimant has failed to engage with the process to prove disability or identify the claims. 4. The claim is therefore struck out. 5. The hearing on 26 May 2026 will not take place. Approved by: Employment Judge Cowen Date: 19 May 2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 20 May 2026 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.